Azaranica is a non-biased news aggregator on Hazaras. The main aim is to promote understanding and respect for cultural identities by highlighting the realities they face on daily basis...Hazaras have been the victim of active persecution and discrimination and one of the reasons among many has been the lack of information, awareness, and disinformation.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

VIEW : Hazaras and the poison against them — I — Liaquat Ali Hazara

The writer’s vague understanding of the genuineness of the Hazaras’ chronicles vis-a-vis their ethno-religious persecution is disparagingly weak

There are more fools in the world than there are people — Heinrich Heine.

After reading the entire article of Surat Khan Marri in Daily Times (June 23, 2012),I realized that the article is filled with contemptuous and irrational annotations about the Pakistani Hazaras. The writer’s vague understanding of the genuineness of the Hazaras’ chronicles vis-a-vis their ethno-religious persecution is disparagingly weak. Similarly, he significantly lacks the potential to do thorough research about the subject before writing. His stark shallowness casts doubts about his credentials of addressing an issue in an otherwise professional tone. I am not at all surprised the way he has sketched the entire ethno-religious scenario of Quetta compared with the subjugation of the Hazaras in that there are hate and conspiracy mongers all around who play into the hands of others. My recent article about the role of intelligence agencies and government functionaries, especially in Quetta, to pit the Hazaras against the Pashtuns, the Baloch, the Punjabis and vice versa, denotes the former’s manoeuvrings from a different perspective (see http://liaquatalihazara.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/pakistan-islamic-or-moderate-islamic-state/).

Arguably, they strive to sow the seeds of hatred among brotherly nations of Balochistan who have been living there with exemplary peace for centuries. Let us scrutinise the write-up of the above said columnist scientifically to ascertain its weight.

In the first paragraph, Marri tried to create ambiguities as if the Hazaras were not of Mongol origin. There are numerous authentic sources for ready reference to verify their ancestral genealogy but the proceeding passage(s) are quoted to correct his understanding and knowledge about his claims. The Encyclopaedia of the World Muslims: tribes, castes and communities, volume 2 and Encyclopaedia of the Stateless Nations, Ethnic and National Groups around the world, volume II D-K have clearly described the lineal descent of the Hazaras as Mongol. Genghis Khan or the Great Khan was also born in a Mongol tribe (Herald Lamb’s book on Genghis Khan: Emperor of All Men).

The Hazaras, contrary to his views, clinched the top 11 out of 16 posts in Afghanistan’s last year’s competitive examination, which may be ascertained from the official website of the country. The writer further shows his failure to confirm the entire population of Afghanistan at present, which could have been sought through reliable literary sources.

No census has taken place in Afghanistan since 1971, hence it is difficult to verify the exact number of people living there. However, the Central Intelligence Agency’s estimate of 2001’s Afghanistan population has been quoted in Far East and Australasia 2003, p.79-84 as 26,813,057. In view of the quoted figure, all the nationalities of Afghanistan agreed at the Bonn Conference, 2002, to accept the Hazara population as 19-20 percent, which accounts for 5,362,611. It is needless to mention that the Hazaras successfully secured 54 seats in the previous general elections in Afghanistan.

The abuse of the word community for the Hazaras must be repealed as they have been officially recognised as the second largest ethnicity in Afghanistan. The writer needs to enhance his understanding of the term and in that, he could have substituted the word community with that of nation. The Hazaras have always had a pivotal role in making Afghanistan a prosperous country. Evidently, the chains of educational establishments and basic health units in Hazara-inhabited areas of the country and the inclination of people towards education have escaped the writer’s attention. Generous Hazaras living overseas finance the smooth functioning and maintenance of these facilities. Besides, Bamyan was declared the most peaceful province in Afghanistan by the UN in 2008 while over 50 percent of students studying in Kabul University are Hazaras.

Wikipedia and other reliable sources reveal that the Hazaras, before the brutal regime of Abdul Rehman in Afghanistan, constituted 65 percent of the population of the country, which, by any standards, was mammoth. However, the wars between the Hazaras and the then despot king, Abdul Rehman, culminated in the former’s ethnic cleansing and severe persecution to the extent that the captives were sold off to others as slaves. These mass-scale human rights violations also drove the Hazaras off their native land to neighbouring countries, viz. Pakistan, Iran, India and Tajikistan, etc. However, there is no credible proof to indicate that the Hazaras may have been sold to the Baloch. The writer has further attempted to oversimplify the historical details as though the Hazaras, who were sold as slaves to the Baloch, managed to develop contacts and interaction with others across the border into far-flung and dilapidated areas of central Afghanistan. It must be remembered, however, that the Hazaras were forcibly driven out of their native land at the time of war in the 1880s. As a result, the social, financial and political subjugation of the Hazaras compelled them to move to the then colonial British India. A large number of them started their lives afresh in Quetta while others moved further up towards the northern parts of India.

The writer’s erroneous information on Balochistan and the Baloch in this region portrays a vivid dichotomy between his research and analytical approach towards the subject. Never mind the Baloch origins and their migration into presently known Balochistan, but certainly most of the Baloch tribes are still living their lives as nomads in remote areas of the province, who keep travelling far across the province throughout the year. Readers are invited to ponder how the nomads could afford to bargain slaves’ rates when they themselves live below the poverty line. Similar to that, how could the enslaved Hazara boys and girls (as he claims), have developed interactions and contacts in the 1880s onwards in Afghanistan when the two Afghan ethnicities were at war? Surat Khan Marri, while writing about the extremities of the wars of the 1880s, inclines to overlook the feasibility of contacting someone hundreds of miles away or building interactions without the availability of modern telecommunication facilities.

The readers may remember that Pakistan until 1971 was run under the two units formula, which constituted the presently independent state of Bangladesh as East Pakistan and the rest of the country as West Pakistan. The four provinces in Pakistan prevailed after the independence of Bangladesh in 1971.

The cognizant readers know better and shall agree with the point that the army, be it British or Pakistani, has to follow strict rules and regulations of their organisations where nepotism or favouritism bear no meaning when it comes to recruiting commissioned officers. One is also aware that until some years ago, the Inter-Services Selection Board (ISSB) maintained two-tier selection processes for all interested candidates wishing to join the Pakistan army. A regional office was set up in the province’s capital while the main offices were in Karachi/Lahore. They would recruit capable youths to serve the country as well as representing it internationally. Hazaras, having the guts and talents coupled with diligence and hard work, would be selected from Balochistan. We are proud to have produced talented people in all walks of life, including the army. The preoccupied column writer has again tried to overstep the historical facts as he deliberately blurred this episode. General Musa Khan Hazara rose to the rank of commander-in-chief in the Pakistan army, which is equivalent to the post and prestige of the chief of army staff (COAS). He is the only Balochistani who holds this honour. Sherbat Ali Changezi is the only Balochichistani army officer who rose to the rank of air marshal and fought the two wars against India in 1965 and 1971. Besides, Saira Batool is the only Balochistani Hazara female pilot in the Pakistan army who is trained to fly aircraft.

(To be continued)

The writer is a London-based freelance journalist, and the chairperson of a political organisation, known as Hazara United Movement (HUM)

Two including Imam Bargah cleric beheaded in Quetta

Published: July 11, 2012

Bodies found from Mian Gundi area, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility.

QUETTA: Two bodies, including one identified of an Imam Bargah prayer leader, have been recovered from the Mian Gundi area on the outskirts of Quetta on Wednesday.

According to the police, some people informed the police about the presence of the bodies in a mountain near Mian Gundi area. Officials rushed to the spot and cordoned off the area after discovering the bodies.

The bodies were shifted to the Bolan Medical Teaching Hospital for an autopsy.

“They were slaughtered and beheaded in a brutal manner,” hospital sources said adding that their ages ranged between 28-30 years of age.

They were identified as leader of Satellite Town Imam Bargah Maulana Nour Ali Nour and Syed Haseeb Abad Zaidi, a resident of Sirki Road, Quetta.

Sources said the men had been identified by the slips found on their bodies, in which the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) claimed responsibility for the killing.

Relatives of Haseeb told the media that he had been kidnapped from Satellite Town around 19 days ago.

“The kidnappers had demanded a ransom of Rs1.9 million and we paid them Rs1.5 million but then they demanded a million more,” said the family.

منطقه قلعه فتوح ریشخور شهر کابل بالای

Monday, July 9, 2012

آپ ایک درزی ہیں۔۔۔


سجاد حسین چنگیزی

آخری وقت اشاعت: پير 9 جولائ 2012 ,‭ 15:41 GMT 20:41 PST


ہزارہ شیعہ کے ساتھ جو کچھ ہو رہا ہے وہ سب کے سامنے ہے

علی عباس جلالپوری کی کتاب میں ڈاکٹر سگمنڈ فرائیڈ کا ایک لطیفہ ہے ۔ ارے صاحب، یہودی فرائیڈ با لکل کافر ہے اور جنت میں بھی نہیں جائے گا (خیر جنت جانے کا اُس کافر کو چنداں شوق بھی نہیں)۔ جلالپوری صاحب سے بھی آپ کو پرخاش سہی لیکن لطیفہ سننے میں کیا حرج ہے؟

کہتے ہیں کسی زمانے میں، کسی علاقے میں کوئی قبیلہ آباد تھا جن کی وجہ شہرت اُ ن کی عدالت پسندی ، قانون پرستی اور قانون کا بے لچک نفاذ تھا۔ قانون پر عمل درآمد اُن میں اس قدر سختی سے رائج تھا کہ قبیلے کے سردار کی ذات بھی اٰس بےلچک اور بلا مصلحت نفاذ سے مبرا نہیں تھی۔ اب ہوا یہ کہ ایک دن میاں لوہار نے ایک بندہ خدا کا خون کر دیا۔سو اجلاس ہوا، کمیٹی بیٹھی، اور جیسا کہ متوقع تھا، اتفاق ِ رائے سے لوہار کو سزائے موت سنا دی گئی اور لوہار کو پھانسی دینے کے لیے ایک مخصوص دن کا انتخاب کیا گیا۔

اتفا ق دیکھئے کے جن دنوں میاں لوہار جیل کی کو ٹھڑی میں اپنی پھانسی کا انتظار کر رہے تھے، اطلاع موصول ہوئی کہ ایک اور قبیلہ حملے کی تیاری میں مصروف ہے اور عنقریب اِس قبیلے پر دھاوا بول دے گا۔

مزید پتہ چلا کی میاں لوہا ر قبیلے کے واحد لوہار رہ گئے تھے ۔ قبیلے کے سب بڑے بوڑھے ، مُلّا ، قاضی، فوجی سب ہی بڑے پریشان ہوئے ۔ ایک طرف عزّت و عصمت، قانون کی پاسداری کا سوال جو قبیلے کی امتیازی صفت اور وجہ نیک نامی تھی اور دوسری طرف جنگ کے خطرے کے پیش ِ نظر واحد لوہار کی ضرورت، جس نے تلوار ، نیزے ، بھالے اور خنجر ڈھالنے تھے۔ سب شش و پنج میں تھے کہ کیا کیا جائے؟ نظریۂ ضرورت کا سب کو شدّت سے احساس ہوا۔ لیکن قبیلے میں عقلمند لوگوں کی کمی نہ تھی سو دوبارہ مُلّا ، قاضی ، فوجی اور سردار سر جوڑ کر بیٹھے، طویل گفت و شنید ہوئی اور گھنٹوں کے سوچ بچار کے بعد فیصلہ کیا گیا کہ چونکہ قبیلے میں صرف ایک لوہار ہے جبکہ چار درزی ہیں اور پھانسی اور قانون پر عمل در آمد بھی ضروری ہے۔ لہٰذا میاں لوہار کو چھوڑ کر ایک درزی کو پھانسی پر چڑھا دیا گیا۔

جب جب نظریۂ ضرورت کی بات چلتی ہے، جب قانون پرستی، آزاد عدلیہ اور بے لچک انصاف کا چرچا ہونے لگتا ہے، تب تب مجھے یہ لطیفہ یاد آتا ہے۔

جب جب جیلوں سے ’لوہاروں‘ کو کبھی پارلیمنٹ، کبھی کسی ضروری جگہ مذاکرات اور اہم گفت و شنید کے لیے ہیلی کاپٹر میں لے جایا جاتا ہے، نہ جانے کیوں میں الماری کے اندر سے مٹّی تلے دبے جلالپوری صاحب کی اِس کتاب کو جھاڑ پُونچھ کر نکالتا ہوں۔ شاید اس لیے نہیں کہ کافر اور یہودی فرائیڈ کے اس لطیفہ سے کسی ’مومن مسلمان‘ کو کوئی نتیجہ مل سکتا ہے بلکہ ہزارہ شیعہ دوستوں سے میری بات چیت ہوتی رہتی ہے جو آج کل حیرت، وحشت اور مایوسی کے مِلے جُلے احساسات کے ساتھ بار بار پوچھتے ہیں ’آخر ہمارا قصور کیا ہے؟‘

میں صرف انھیں بتانا چاہتا ہوں کہ آپ میاں لوہار نہیں، آپ ایک ’درزی‘ ہیں!

Nawjogh Cultural program 4 of 7.f4v

Hazaragi Mongolian Song (Music defies cultural speciation)

Behind the Buddhas of Bamiyan: the other side of Afghanistan

Isabella Cookson talks to the independent documentary maker, Phil Grabsky.

by Isabella Cookson

Monday 9th July 2012, 09:26 BST


In March 2001 the world stood in shock as the Taliban destroyed the 2,000 year- old Buddhas of Bamiyan. Award winning documentary maker, Phil Grabsky, tells a different story.

Living in the caves surrounding the Buddhas lives 8-year-old Mir and his family. Grabsky’s unique documentary “The Boy Mir” tracks the life of an ordinary Afghan boy over ten years: there are no patronising voiceovers, no special effects and the family speak straight to the camera.

The project began in 2002, when Grabsky arrived in Afghanistan intent on finding out about the people behind the news coverage that so often focuses on the military attacks. “Mir, in a funny sort of way, found me. He saw me filming on my first day in Bamiyan and lent into the camera. I thought I would be making a film about an adult male but actually in Afghanistan in 2002 the men were exhausted, depressed, broke, without work, without hope and therefore there was no story to drive this along.”

There is certainly a beautiful contrast in the films between the cheeky smile of the young boy and the cynical depression of his relatives who have seen better days.

“His brother’s narrative doesn’t change over the ten years, so the film would not have been as interesting had it followed an older person. Whereas we watch Mir grow from 8-18 and watch him physically change too. He at 17 looks like most 27 year olds, he has aged a lot. If Mir gets to 45 in that culture, he’ll be lucky. There were many adventures to be played out, I had no idea that he would end up working down a mine, ploughing fields and so forth. It was scary and exciting because I didn’t know how the story would work out.”

With his co-director, Shoaib Sharifi, a film-maker and Afghan national, Grabsky committed to going to Afghanistan each year for almost a decade. I wonder what it was like to film and live there during one of the most turbulent times in its history.
The subject of Grabsky's documentary, Mir

“I personally found it scary. In a funny way, it’s not so scary when you are there, it’s scary building up to it. Deciding when it’s safer to go: I have two small children and I am putting myself at risk. I must say, there are journalists who are doing this all the time. As a filmmaker I only have to spend a few weeks of the year in Afghanistan, nothing compared to someone who goes to Libya and stays there for months on end and is actively looking for those hotspots. That said, there is a difference between perceived risk and actual risk. The perceived risk of Afghanistan is very clear: you could be kidnapped, you could be captured by the Taliban and beheaded on film; this is the perceived risk that has some basis of truth. The actual risk is very hard to judge. More people die in Britain from bad driving than from terrorism. So you have to think realistically. Afghanistan is a wonderful country, full of interesting people, great food, they are very hospitable, but there are security issues you must take very seriously.”

Grabsky did experience some very near scrapes with the Taliban, “One time we made the mistake of driving at night back to Kabul in 2003. We ran into a Taliban roadblock and I did not want to be there, my thoughts were immediately back at home with my family. But I mean, Afghans are dealing with this every single day, I was flying immediately back to London and was leaving it all behind.”

In a documentary the question of how “real” the film is is an inevitable one: something that he himself was very self-conscious of. “Everything is a choice: you have to be careful about arguing for the reality of the situation. When I’m there, it’s my choice which direction I am pointing the camera, how I’m behaving off screen is affecting the characters, right down to the editing, the music, and in the case of Mir, the translation. All these things are creative or editorial choices. It boils down to the Grierson definition of documentary films that they are “the creative treatment of actuality”. Before you do anything you have to have a sense of what it is that you’re trying to achieve. Too often documentary filmmakers rely on access: I’ve got access to an aircraft carrier or to a hospital or something. That isn’t enough- what is it that you’re trying to achieve with that access?”

Grabsky describes the film as “the most important film I have made”, referring throughout the interview to our cultural need to probe deeper into issues often casually referred to in the media. “We as a society have now invested $900 billion in the war in Afghanistan. Many people have given life and limb in Afghanistan and for us in a way. How can you not be interested to know who the Afghan people are that this fighting is happening around and for? We unfortunately live in a culture of non-thinking, lots of people drift through life without really thinking about things and aren’t that interested in Afghanistan. Personally, I can’t imagine why you wouldn’t be interested and if you are interested in Afghanistan then you must be interested in the Afghan people.”

The uncertainty surrounding the continued presence of British and American troops in Afghanistan has been a cause of political polemic. The current opinion seems favour withdrawal. “When people say, “Oh we’ve just got to get out of there, why do we care about the Afghan people? We just need to get the troops out.” I think it’s a selfish and naïve position, it’s much more complicated than that. You need to understand the situation before you can come to a decision on it. I watch Question Time, and I watch people talk about Afghanistan and they haven’t a clue.

“We are not persecuted here because we are of a particular religion or sex, we don’t think about it. But in Afghanistan being Shia or Hazara puts you at risk and there is nothing ignoble about us wanting to help Afghans live better lives. Much more importantly, we need to ask what is the best way to help? The answer, in my opinion is less focus on military and more focus on aid, more long term planning and less short term running around mountain ranges.

Phil Grabsky is an independent filmmaker and director of Seventh-art; find our more about his work at http://www.seventh-art.com/about.php.