Azaranica is a non-biased news aggregator on Hazaras. The main aim is to promote understanding and respect for cultural identities by highlighting the realities they face on daily basis...Hazaras have been the victim of active persecution and discrimination and one of the reasons among many has been the lack of information, awareness, and disinformation.
Sunday, August 14, 2011
Targeted killings of Hazaras
The rise in sectarian violence in Balochistan is forcing its Persian-speaking Shia community to flee to safer places in the country.
Photo: Metrix X, flickr
After a brief pause, sectarian violence is once again on the rise in Quetta, the capital city of Balochistan province in Pakistan. In the last few months, at least 41 people, all belonging to the Hazara minority which follows the Shia sect of Islam, have been killed in separate targeted attacks.
A few days ago, 14 Hazaras were gunned to death in the city in two separate attacks. In mid-July, two Hazara government officials had been shot dead by unknown assailants, while a month before that Director of Pakistan Sports Board, Syed Abrar Hussain Shah, a three-time Olympics representative from Pakistan, had been similarly murdered. The month of June saw two dead and 11 others injured when a group of armed men ambushed a bus carrying Hazara pilgrims to Iran. In May, 14 Hazaras, including a little baby, were killed in two separate attacks, one of which was a well-coordinated rocket attack. An independent news source states that over 200 Shias have been killed in Balochistan in the last three years.
The Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), a banned sectarian organisation, allegedly linked with Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), al-Qaeda and other Afghan Taliban groups, has claimed the responsibility for these killings. After the death of the al-Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden, the LeJ vowed to avenge his killing by targeting not only Pakistan’s government officials and security forces but also its Hazara community. Recently, threatening letters have been widely distributed in Quetta, warning the Hazaras to prepare for more fatal attacks, which the LeJ calls a jihad similar to the one carried out against Hazaras in Afghanistan during the Taliban’s rule.
The Hazaras in Afghanistan, the third-largest ethnic group in the country, were heavily oppressed during the Taliban regime. Massacres in large numbers were carried out in the provinces of Bamiyan, Ghazni and Balkh, as the Taliban suspected that the Hazaras collaborated with the Afghan Northern Alliance, an organisation fighting the Taliban regime at the time. Experts on militancy issues believe that the Taliban had help in the killings from the LeJ and its mother organisation, Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP).
Hazaras in Balochistan, however, had been left alone at the time, with the onset of targeted killings seen only after the Taliban were ousted from power. When the Taliban rule collapsed, so did the al-Qaeda-linked Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and other jihadi groups, the blame for which was placed on the Pakistani Hazaras for allegedly colluding with the Americans and aiding in their ultimate downfall. As the city became a major hub for the defeated Taliban groups, it also provided a new vent for the expression of the Taliban hatred towards the Hazaras.
‘Apart from being ideological opposites,’ says Abdul Khaliq, head of the Hazara Democratic Party (HDP), ‘the Taliban have historic bitterness against the Hazaras, killing, according to an Amnesty International report, some 12,000 Hazaras in central Afghanistan.’ This bitterness, coupled with mere conjectures on the Hazaras’ collusion with the American and NATO forces, he adds, is now leading the Pakistani militants groups, especially the LeJ, to murder the Hazaras in Quetta.
Poor government response
The LeJ is regarded as Pakistan’s fiercest Sunni extremist outfit and is accused of killing hundreds of Shias since its emergence in 1996. Usman Saifullah Kurd and Dawood Badini are believed to be heading the LeJ network in Quetta. Both of them had been apprehended by the Karachi police (Kurd in 2002 and Badini in 2004) and subsequently handed over to the Balochistan police. However, in 2008, they managed to escape from the Anti-Terrorist Forces headquarters at the Quetta cantonment. Apart from their involvement in suicide attacks on Shia religious processions, mosques and on Shia imams, the two are accused of killing dozens of professionals, police cadets and political activists, a majority of whom belonged to the Hazara community.
‘The Hazaras have been at the receiving end of violence for almost a decade now,’ says Amjad Hussain, a senior journalist, ‘but, not surprisingly, their plight remains largely unknown. And the culprits remain at large, and are encouraged by either the state’s participation or its indifference.’Abdul Khaliq agrees, saying that the increase in militancy in Balochistan is not solely the result of social unrest but also a clear indication of bad governance. ‘The LeJ claims the killings of Hazaras, and the government claims to have arrested the suspects, but the alleged attackers are never brought before the public or any court of law,’ he says. In 2009, HDP’s then-chairman Hussain Ali Yousafi was assassinated and the killers are yet to be identified.
The government’s failure at tackling the militants involved in sectarian violence has forced the Hazara community members to leave Quetta city for safer places like Karachi and Islamabad. Apart from threatening letters issued by the LeJ, which order them to leave Quetta city by 2012, the Hazaras have been the subject ofvitriolic speeches against Shias by religious clerics belonging to banned militants’ outfits. The intelligence agencies are believed to be aware about the whereabouts of all militant outfits including the LeJ, and yet the banned outfits publicly operate under new names. It is also believed that members of the Afghan Taliban leadership council are based in Quetta and/or in the neighbouring areas, but the Pakistani government continues to deny such reports.
Despite a long history of sectarian killings in Balochistan, especially in Quetta, the government has failed to bring the perpetrators to justice. Whatever the ultimate motive is, and whatever the politics involved, fanning such sectarian violence in Balochistan is destroying the centuries-long ethnic harmony. The recent killings only further widened the gulf between the Sunnis and Shias, pitting the Shia Hazaras against the local Pashtuns and other Baloch ethnic communities. While the government and its law enforcement agencies might not condone such attacks, their inefficacy in prosecuting the guilty displays a sense of lack of urgency in defeating the terrorist outfits. And this only serves these organisations’ objective of converting progressive and liberal Balochistan into a religious and Talibanised province.
~ Zia Ur Rehman is a freelance journalist and researcher based in Karachi.
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Monday, July 18, 2011
Monday, May 9, 2011
پترائوس: فعلا برنامه انتقال مسئولیت مهم ترین برنامه است
به روز شده: 13:12 گرينويچ - دوشنبه 09 مه 2011 - 19 اردیبهشت 1390
ژنرال دیوید پترائوس فرمانده نیروهای ائتلاف و ناتو در دیدارش با مقام های محلی بامیان تاکید کرده است که برنامه انتقال مسئولیت تامین امنیت از ناتو به نیروهای افغان درحال حاضر مهم ترین برنامه جامعه جهانی و دولت افغانستان و این برنامه باید با موفقیت کامل انجام شود.
این برنامه که قرار است تابستان امسال در هفت ولایت افغانستان به اجرا گذاشته شود، تا حدود یک ماه دیگر نخست از ولایت بامیان در مرکز افغانستان آغاز خواهد شد.
ولایت بامیان در سالهای پس از سقوط طالبان آرام بوده و شماری از نیروهای نیوزیلند در مرکز این ولایت مستقربوده اند. نیوزیلند در افغانستان حدود ٢٥٠٠ سرباز دارد که از این میان حدود ١٠٧ تن از آنها در مرکز ولایت بامیان هستند.
نیروهای نیوزیلندی در ده سال گذشته در بامیان، شاهد هیچ درگیری مسلحانه ای نبوده اند.
فرمانده ناتو و ائتلاف، در دیدارش با حبیبه سرابی والی ولایت بامیان و دیگر مقام های محلی این ولایت گفته است که موفقیت یا عدم موفقیت این برنامه در بامیان، بر کل این روند در دیگر نقاط افغانستان تاثیر خواهد کرد.
در این دیدار مقام های محلی بامیان و ژنرال پترائوس، توانایی نیروهای امنیتی، نیازمندی ها و شرایط و امکانات برنامه انتقال کامل مسئولیت تامین امنیت ولایت بامیان به نیروهای امنیتی افغان را بررسی کردند.
مقام های محلی بامیان می گویند، ژنرال پترائوس قول داده است که برای موفقیت برنامه انتقال مسئولیت به نیروهای افغان، برنامه هایی را برای توسعه و بازسازی این ولایت اجرا خواهند کرد.
بامیانی ها همواره از دولت افغانستان به دلیل بی توجهی به بازسازی و توسعه این ولایت انتقاد کرده اند.
مردم بامیان در اعتراض به اینکه جاده های آنها آسفالت نشده، سال گذشته بخش هایی از جاده را کاهگل کردند. چند ماه پیش در اعتراض مدنی دیگر به کمبود آب آشامیدنی و بی توجهی دولت، به الاغ هایی که به خانه ها آبرسانی می کردند، مدال خدمت دادند و در آخرین مورد، یک چراغ نفتی بزرگ ساختند و در اعتراض به نبود برق، آن را در چها راه اصلی شهر، نصب کردند.
حالا ژنرال پترائوس گفته است که برای موفقیت برنامه انتقال مسئولیت های امنیتی، برنامه هایی جدی را برای بازسازی و ایجاد اشتغال در بامیان روی دست خواهند گرفت.
بامیانی ها هنوز به چنین وعده هایی به دیده شک می نگرند.
Source,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/afghanistan/2011/05/110509_l09_petraus_bamian.shtml
ژنرال دیوید پترائوس فرمانده نیروهای ائتلاف و ناتو در دیدارش با مقام های محلی بامیان تاکید کرده است که برنامه انتقال مسئولیت تامین امنیت از ناتو به نیروهای افغان درحال حاضر مهم ترین برنامه جامعه جهانی و دولت افغانستان و این برنامه باید با موفقیت کامل انجام شود.
این برنامه که قرار است تابستان امسال در هفت ولایت افغانستان به اجرا گذاشته شود، تا حدود یک ماه دیگر نخست از ولایت بامیان در مرکز افغانستان آغاز خواهد شد.
ولایت بامیان در سالهای پس از سقوط طالبان آرام بوده و شماری از نیروهای نیوزیلند در مرکز این ولایت مستقربوده اند. نیوزیلند در افغانستان حدود ٢٥٠٠ سرباز دارد که از این میان حدود ١٠٧ تن از آنها در مرکز ولایت بامیان هستند.
نیروهای نیوزیلندی در ده سال گذشته در بامیان، شاهد هیچ درگیری مسلحانه ای نبوده اند.
فرمانده ناتو و ائتلاف، در دیدارش با حبیبه سرابی والی ولایت بامیان و دیگر مقام های محلی این ولایت گفته است که موفقیت یا عدم موفقیت این برنامه در بامیان، بر کل این روند در دیگر نقاط افغانستان تاثیر خواهد کرد.
در این دیدار مقام های محلی بامیان و ژنرال پترائوس، توانایی نیروهای امنیتی، نیازمندی ها و شرایط و امکانات برنامه انتقال کامل مسئولیت تامین امنیت ولایت بامیان به نیروهای امنیتی افغان را بررسی کردند.
مقام های محلی بامیان می گویند، ژنرال پترائوس قول داده است که برای موفقیت برنامه انتقال مسئولیت به نیروهای افغان، برنامه هایی را برای توسعه و بازسازی این ولایت اجرا خواهند کرد.
بامیانی ها همواره از دولت افغانستان به دلیل بی توجهی به بازسازی و توسعه این ولایت انتقاد کرده اند.
مردم بامیان در اعتراض به اینکه جاده های آنها آسفالت نشده، سال گذشته بخش هایی از جاده را کاهگل کردند. چند ماه پیش در اعتراض مدنی دیگر به کمبود آب آشامیدنی و بی توجهی دولت، به الاغ هایی که به خانه ها آبرسانی می کردند، مدال خدمت دادند و در آخرین مورد، یک چراغ نفتی بزرگ ساختند و در اعتراض به نبود برق، آن را در چها راه اصلی شهر، نصب کردند.
حالا ژنرال پترائوس گفته است که برای موفقیت برنامه انتقال مسئولیت های امنیتی، برنامه هایی جدی را برای بازسازی و ایجاد اشتغال در بامیان روی دست خواهند گرفت.
بامیانی ها هنوز به چنین وعده هایی به دیده شک می نگرند.
Source,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/afghanistan/2011/05/110509_l09_petraus_bamian.shtml
In Afghanistan, India Inc learns to hang togethe
By
Indrajit Gupta
Amidst all the drama around Osama bin Laden’s assassination, we shouldn’t lose sight of an important game-changing story brewing in the region, especially from an Indian perspective.
Sometime in August this year, some of the largest mining and steel companies around the world will make final bids for the exploration rights to the 1.8 billion tonne Hajigak iron ore mines in the war-torn Bamiyan province in Afghanistan.
There’s a good reason why my colleagues and I at Forbes India have been following this story very closely. So here’s the angle that’s worth tracking: 15 Indian firms are among a total of 22 firms bidding for these assets, considered to be among the biggest iron ore deposits available through an open market process. If they bid individually, they’d get swept aside by their bigger rivals, like Vale of Brazil.
So after much deliberation, our steel firms, at least five of them, are contemplating bidding as a consortium. And what’s more, the Indian government is likely to dip into its existing corpus for rebuilding Afghanistan and put up 15 percent of the acquisition cost. If the government sticks to its word, it could again be the first time that the government has supported an initiative such as this.
Now, while the concept of co-opetition, or collaborating to compete, is now widely understood, I believe this current move in Afghanistan represents a new narrative for India Inc. It’s not often that competitors in India are able to set aside their intense industry rivalries to come together for a larger cause. When we met Malay Mukherjee, the CEO of Essar Steel and one of the key architects of this consortium, he told us just how difficult it was for Indian entrepreneurs to change their prevailing mindsets. In the last decade, one such experiment—the Indian Steel Alliance—has already collapsed when Tata Steel walked out of it. So what’s changed? Quite simply, across the world, Indian players have realised the futility of being drawn into intense bidding wars for iron ore mines, particularly with the three global mining companies who control 70 percent of the iron ore reserves. So now, pushed to the wall, they’re finally coming around to the view that co-opetition perhaps does make economic sense.
Stitching together the new partnership hasn’t been easy. Fortunately, for the Indian steel industry, three key change agents have come to the forefront: Mukherjee, who worked as a senior executive for 15 years with Lakshmi Mittal’s Arcelor Mittal, Chandra Shekhar Verma, the new SAIL chairman, and V Krishnamurthy, the doyen of the Indian manufacturing industry and former SAIL chairman. They’ve been ably supported by PK Mishra, the current steel secretary.
Designing how the consortium works isn’t really that difficult. So far, while it looks like NMDC, India’s largest iron ore miner, will lead the Indian consortium, the partners will get the allocation of resources according to the investment they bring. And the NMDC-led consortium could include SAIL, Tata Steel, JSW and Essar, which is practically the majority of the Indian steel industry. This could give the Indian consortium more than a realistic change to pip the rest of the playing field.
While the public and private sector players may indeed succeed in forging an alliance, it’s the government’s role and its perceived ambivalence that needs to be watched carefully. So far, India Inc’s international expansion has largely been on its own steam. Unlike the Chinese, the Indian state, for most part, has chosen to watch from the sidelines.
This time, the steel industry is hoping that the government realises the strategic benefits of gaining access to mineral resources for an economy to maintain its trajectory of growth for the next 10 years. Without access to vital iron ore reserves, the India growth story could come to a grinding halt. If the bid goes to plan, the government could consider a long-standing decision to create a new multi-billion dollar sovereign fund that supports domestic companies to buy energy assets—oil, coal and iron ore—abroad. So far, there hasn’t been enough consensus within the government and in the public policy domain for a poor country like India to spend its monies on creating a sovereign fund to buy assets abroad, instead of using it to tackle the public welfare issues of education, health and infrastructure. Like all things in India, this is one of those larger ideological debates we tend to get locked into—without any hope of ever finding a viable solution.
On the Afghanistan bid, though, apart from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), there are three key ministries that will need to work together to make this joint bid a reality: steel, external affairs and finance. And their track record in the past of giving up turf wars to support industry action has been far from encouraging. Last week, I spoke to KV Kamath, the chairman of ICICI Bank and Infosys, who spoke of the intense frustration during his term as president of CII to get these different ministries to see eye-to-eye.
So even if private and public enterprises realise the value of such co-opetition, it may still be too much to expect the government to drop all its baggage and step up to the challenge. Of course, if you’re an optimist, it may make sense to make sense to wait for the ides of August.
Source,
http://www.firstpost.com/economy/in-afghanistan-india-inc-learns-to-hang-together-6145.html
Indrajit Gupta
Amidst all the drama around Osama bin Laden’s assassination, we shouldn’t lose sight of an important game-changing story brewing in the region, especially from an Indian perspective.
Sometime in August this year, some of the largest mining and steel companies around the world will make final bids for the exploration rights to the 1.8 billion tonne Hajigak iron ore mines in the war-torn Bamiyan province in Afghanistan.
There’s a good reason why my colleagues and I at Forbes India have been following this story very closely. So here’s the angle that’s worth tracking: 15 Indian firms are among a total of 22 firms bidding for these assets, considered to be among the biggest iron ore deposits available through an open market process. If they bid individually, they’d get swept aside by their bigger rivals, like Vale of Brazil.
So after much deliberation, our steel firms, at least five of them, are contemplating bidding as a consortium. And what’s more, the Indian government is likely to dip into its existing corpus for rebuilding Afghanistan and put up 15 percent of the acquisition cost. If the government sticks to its word, it could again be the first time that the government has supported an initiative such as this.
Now, while the concept of co-opetition, or collaborating to compete, is now widely understood, I believe this current move in Afghanistan represents a new narrative for India Inc. It’s not often that competitors in India are able to set aside their intense industry rivalries to come together for a larger cause. When we met Malay Mukherjee, the CEO of Essar Steel and one of the key architects of this consortium, he told us just how difficult it was for Indian entrepreneurs to change their prevailing mindsets. In the last decade, one such experiment—the Indian Steel Alliance—has already collapsed when Tata Steel walked out of it. So what’s changed? Quite simply, across the world, Indian players have realised the futility of being drawn into intense bidding wars for iron ore mines, particularly with the three global mining companies who control 70 percent of the iron ore reserves. So now, pushed to the wall, they’re finally coming around to the view that co-opetition perhaps does make economic sense.
Stitching together the new partnership hasn’t been easy. Fortunately, for the Indian steel industry, three key change agents have come to the forefront: Mukherjee, who worked as a senior executive for 15 years with Lakshmi Mittal’s Arcelor Mittal, Chandra Shekhar Verma, the new SAIL chairman, and V Krishnamurthy, the doyen of the Indian manufacturing industry and former SAIL chairman. They’ve been ably supported by PK Mishra, the current steel secretary.
Designing how the consortium works isn’t really that difficult. So far, while it looks like NMDC, India’s largest iron ore miner, will lead the Indian consortium, the partners will get the allocation of resources according to the investment they bring. And the NMDC-led consortium could include SAIL, Tata Steel, JSW and Essar, which is practically the majority of the Indian steel industry. This could give the Indian consortium more than a realistic change to pip the rest of the playing field.
While the public and private sector players may indeed succeed in forging an alliance, it’s the government’s role and its perceived ambivalence that needs to be watched carefully. So far, India Inc’s international expansion has largely been on its own steam. Unlike the Chinese, the Indian state, for most part, has chosen to watch from the sidelines.
This time, the steel industry is hoping that the government realises the strategic benefits of gaining access to mineral resources for an economy to maintain its trajectory of growth for the next 10 years. Without access to vital iron ore reserves, the India growth story could come to a grinding halt. If the bid goes to plan, the government could consider a long-standing decision to create a new multi-billion dollar sovereign fund that supports domestic companies to buy energy assets—oil, coal and iron ore—abroad. So far, there hasn’t been enough consensus within the government and in the public policy domain for a poor country like India to spend its monies on creating a sovereign fund to buy assets abroad, instead of using it to tackle the public welfare issues of education, health and infrastructure. Like all things in India, this is one of those larger ideological debates we tend to get locked into—without any hope of ever finding a viable solution.
On the Afghanistan bid, though, apart from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), there are three key ministries that will need to work together to make this joint bid a reality: steel, external affairs and finance. And their track record in the past of giving up turf wars to support industry action has been far from encouraging. Last week, I spoke to KV Kamath, the chairman of ICICI Bank and Infosys, who spoke of the intense frustration during his term as president of CII to get these different ministries to see eye-to-eye.
So even if private and public enterprises realise the value of such co-opetition, it may still be too much to expect the government to drop all its baggage and step up to the challenge. Of course, if you’re an optimist, it may make sense to make sense to wait for the ides of August.
Source,
http://www.firstpost.com/economy/in-afghanistan-india-inc-learns-to-hang-together-6145.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)